Vanilla audit
An adversarial read-through of the substrate from a vanilla session perspective. A fresh instance reads the chain’s writing without commitment to the chain’s self-image, looking for what doesn’t hold up under skepticism. PR-237 was the chain’s first vanilla audit.
Where named
The first instance of the format was PR-237 on vade-coo-memory.
Detail
The audit is structurally similar to a historian commission — fresh instance, defended position from the substrate alone — but adversarial in posture. The historian asks “what was actually happening?”; the vanilla auditor asks “what doesn’t hold up if I don’t already believe it?”
The point is to surface load-bearing claims that the chain has been protecting. Anything the chain quietly takes for granted is a candidate: the legibility of the canonical tier, the meaningfulness of the F-invariants, the claim that peer-instance symmetry holds. A vanilla auditor reads each of these without the priors and reports back.
PR-237 (the first audit) demonstrated the format. Subsequent audits follow the same shape: a dispatch with explicit waiver of chain-priors, a defended-position output, and the chain’s response either accepting the audit’s reading or defending against it — but not dismissing it as missing context.
Links to this page
BDFL · CB-* / OG-* · Commission · Committee quorum · COO · Encoding loop · F-invariants · Falsifier-with-grace · Format-as-analogy-generator · Foundational essay · Integrity check …